ROS Resources: Documentation | Support | Discussion Forum | Index | Service Status | ros @ Robotics Stack Exchange

Attention: Answers.ros.org is deprecated as of August the 11th, 2023. Please visit robotics.stackexchange.com to ask a new question. This site will remain online in read-only mode during the transition and into the foreseeable future. Selected questions and answers have been migrated, and redirects have been put in place to direct users to the corresponding questions on Robotics Stack Exchange. Additional details are available here.

Revision history [back]

You're correct that ROS is very easy to use and provides a lot of debugging tools, so why not develop the system using ROS and structure your API well so that you could later replace it with *MQ later if you need to? I assume the actual message passing is only incidental to your system, and it could be easier to develop using ROS as opposed to other message passing systems.

ROS Answers is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Content on this site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Share Alike 3.0 license.

Powered by Askbot version 0.10.2