ROS Resources: Documentation | Support | Discussion Forum | Index | Service Status | ros @ Robotics Stack Exchange

Attention: Answers.ros.org is deprecated as of August the 11th, 2023. Please visit robotics.stackexchange.com to ask a new question. This site will remain online in read-only mode during the transition and into the foreseeable future. Selected questions and answers have been migrated, and redirects have been put in place to direct users to the corresponding questions on Robotics Stack Exchange. Additional details are available here.

Revision history [back]

I believe that the nav stack is currently set up to only handle holonomic and differential drive robots.

In order to get it working with an Ackerman steered robot, it would require rewriting large chunks of move_base and base_local_planner in order to accomodate this chassis type.

I believe that the nav stack is currently set up to only handle holonomic and differential drive robots.

In order to get it working with an ~~Ackerman~~ Ackermann steered robot, it would require rewriting large chunks of move_base and base_local_planner in order to accomodate this chassis type.

ROS Answers is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Content on this site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Share Alike 3.0 license.

Powered by Askbot version 0.10.2