ROS Resources: Documentation | Support | Discussion Forum | Index | Service Status | ros @ Robotics Stack Exchange
Ask Your Question
0

Weired situation. I'm exactly following install tutorial but failed.

asked 2012-07-17 00:06:09 -0600

Hyon Lim gravatar image

updated 2014-04-20 14:09:50 -0600

ngrennan gravatar image

Hi. I'm following ROS fuerte install tutorial (install from source). By the way, I got following error message. I just re-installed my Ubuntu 12.04. Very clean. I didn't install anything.

hyon@hyon-t61:~$ rosdep install -a
ERROR: the following packages/stacks could not have their rosdep keys resolved
to system dependencies:
carrot_planner: Missing resource pcl
ROS path [0]=/opt/ros/fuerte/share/ros
ROS path [1]=/home/hyon/ros/navigation
ROS path [2]=/home/hyon/ros/diagnostics
ROS path [3]=/home/hyon/ros/common
ROS path [4]=/home/hyon/ros/robot_model_tutorials
ROS path [5]=/home/hyon/ros/laser_pipeline
ROS path [6]=/home/hyon/ros/simulator_gazebo
ROS path [7]=/home/hyon/ros/visualization_tutorials
ROS path [8]=/home/hyon/ros/geometry
ROS path [9]=/home/hyon/ros/pluginlib
ROS path [10]=/home/hyon/ros/bullet
ROS path [11]=/home/hyon/ros/robot_model
ROS path [12]=/home/hyon/ros/xacro
ROS path [13]=/home/hyon/ros/image_transport_plugins
ROS path [14]=/home/hyon/ros/dynamic_reconfigure
ROS path [15]=/home/hyon/ros/stage
ROS path [16]=/home/hyon/ros/executive_smach
ROS path [17]=/home/hyon/ros/driver_common
ROS path [18]=/home/hyon/ros/physics_ode
ROS path [19]=/home/hyon/ros/visualization_common
ROS path [20]=/home/hyon/ros/python_qt_binding
ROS path [21]=/home/hyon/ros/bond_core
ROS path [22]=/home/hyon/ros/image_common
ROS path [23]=/home/hyon/ros/geometry_visualization
ROS path [24]=/home/hyon/ros/common_rosdeps
ROS path [25]=/home/hyon/ros/diagnostics_monitors
ROS path [26]=/home/hyon/ros/bfl
ROS path [27]=/home/hyon/ros/image_pipeline
ROS path [28]=/home/hyon/ros/common_tutorials
ROS path [29]=/home/hyon/ros/robot_model_visualization
ROS path [30]=/home/hyon/ros/geometry_experimental
ROS path [31]=/home/hyon/ros/perception_pcl
ROS path [32]=/home/hyon/ros/vision_opencv
ROS path [33]=/home/hyon/ros/visualization
ROS path [34]=/home/hyon/ros/executive_smach_visualization
ROS path [35]=/home/hyon/ros/slam_gmapping
ROS path [36]=/home/hyon/ros/filters
ROS path [37]=/home/hyon/ros/orocos_kinematics_dynamics
ROS path [38]=/home/hyon/ros/geometry_tutorials
ROS path [39]=/home/hyon/ros/nodelet_core
ROS path [40]=/opt/ros/fuerte/stacks
ROS path [41]=/opt/ros/fuerte/share
ROS path [42]=/opt/ros/fuerte/share/ros
depth_image_proc: Missing resource pcl
ROS path [0]=/opt/ros/fuerte/share/ros
ROS path [1]=/home/hyon/ros/navigation
ROS path [2]=/home/hyon/ros/diagnostics
ROS path [3]=/home/hyon/ros/common
ROS path [4]=/home/hyon/ros/robot_model_tutorials
ROS path [5]=/home/hyon/ros/laser_pipeline
ROS path [6]=/home/hyon/ros/simulator_gazebo
ROS path [7]=/home/hyon/ros/visualization_tutorials
ROS path [8]=/home/hyon/ros/geometry
ROS path [9]=/home/hyon/ros/pluginlib
ROS path [10]=/home/hyon/ros/bullet
ROS path [11]=/home/hyon/ros/robot_model
ROS path [12]=/home/hyon/ros/xacro
ROS path [13]=/home/hyon/ros/image_transport_plugins
ROS path [14]=/home/hyon/ros/dynamic_reconfigure
ROS path [15]=/home/hyon/ros/stage
ROS path [16]=/home/hyon/ros/executive_smach
ROS path [17]=/home/hyon/ros/driver_common
ROS path [18]=/home/hyon/ros/physics_ode
ROS path ...
(more)
edit retag flag offensive close merge delete

2 Answers

Sort by ยป oldest newest most voted
4

answered 2012-07-17 09:52:36 -0600

rlinsalata gravatar image

I have been going through some similar issues trying to install on PandaBoard from source. The reason someone will need to install from source in Precise, is if they are on an ARM processor (i.e. BeagleBoard, PandaBoard, etc.) - no debian packages for ARM (yet*).

As far as my understanding goes:

  1. ros-fuerte-pcl is a 3rd party dependency (<rosdep> key 'pcl'), which has been patched/wrapped into it's own debian package on Willow's wg-debs github (so that it plays nice with ROS).
  2. There are a bunch of funky naming things going on with 'pcl'-related packages/stacks/dependencies.

    • EX:

    $ rosdep keys pcl
    pcl
    $ rosdep resolve pcl
    #apt
    ros-fuerte-pcl
    $ rospack find pcl
    /opt/ros/fuerte/share/pcl
    $ roslocate info pcl
    - svn:
    local-name: pcl
    uri: http://svn.pointclouds.org/ros/trunk/perception_pcl_unstable/pcl
    $ roslocate type pcl
    package
    
    Btw, http://svn.pointclouds.org/ros/trunk/perception_pcl_unstable/pcl, doesn't exist

    • Some packages depend on a ROS package named 'pcl' (<depend package="pcl"/>), and some depend on an external package, with the key 'pcl' (<rosdep name="pcl"/> e.g. ros-fuerte-pcl).
    • And, I'm not completely sure, but I believe that the "Missing resource pcl" will be satisfied when you install ros-fuerte-pcl (from package or source). There is a subfolder 'ros' in the ros-fuerte-pcl package whose contents get installed in /opt/ros/fuerte/share/pcl (which is where 'rospack find pcl' points me in my debian package install of Fuerte on Precise x86 machine).
    • Side note: perception_pcl includes a ROS package 'pcl_ros' which I think used to mostly serve to pull in the external dependency.
  3. Also, currently rosdep doesn't work for <rosdep> dependencies in stacks (stack.xml). It just ignores them. Thus, if you have to build stacks from source that list their dependencies at the stack level (e.g. ros-fuerte-pcl, opencv) you have to manually go into the stack.xml and install each (debian) package it lists. You may need to resolve those <rosdep> keys into actual package names using rosdep.

  4. You will also notice that you're "missing resource protobuf". This is from packages in simulator_gazebo depending on a ROS package called protobuf. The protobuf ROS package/stack exists for Ubuntu Lucid and earlier, which did not distribute the proper version of the library. In Precise, there should be a protobuf debian package (libprotobuf7), even for ARM, which I'd recommend you just apt-get install manually. Then you can just comment out the shell ROS dependency, <depend package="protobuf"/>, from the manifest.xml's in gazebo_words and gazebo. Your missing protobuf resource should disappear in a rosdep check -a

Sorry if that was a bit of an overload; hopefully it shines some light on what's going on. Also, related FYI: http://answers.ros.org/question/35602/ros-fuerte-pandaboard-ubuntu-1204-no-go/

*There might be armel packages (BeagleBoard) possible in the near future, but armhf (PandaBoard) not as much.

edit flag offensive delete link more

Comments

How can I install ros-fuerte-pcl? I can't find it anywhere... Would be great to get a hint

dinamex gravatar image dinamex  ( 2012-08-24 10:32:55 -0600 )edit

sudo apt-get install ros-fuerte-pcl

jker gravatar image jker  ( 2012-10-11 08:07:37 -0600 )edit

"Side note: perception_pcl includes a ROS package 'pcl_ros' which I think used to mostly serve to pull in the external dependency." $ sudo apt-get install ros-indigo-perception-pcl is what fixed "missing ros_pcl" error so if you're getting warnings of missing ros-pcl merely install perception-pcl

jacksonkr_ gravatar image jacksonkr_  ( 2016-04-16 06:23:00 -0600 )edit
0

answered 2012-07-17 00:49:25 -0600

Lorenz gravatar image

updated 2012-07-17 01:00:27 -0600

Why are you building from source? There are debian packages for Precise which should be preferred.

You are just getting a rosdep error which might not be too critical. I would try to proceed with the next steps and check if more errors because of some missing packages occur.

Edit: Did you follow the steps for setting up rosdep here?

edit flag offensive delete link more

Comments

The reason is that I would like to confirm "build from source" working before I try to install on Beagle board.

Hyon Lim gravatar image Hyon Lim  ( 2012-07-17 00:51:11 -0600 )edit

I modified my original post. Please see $rosdep resolve pcl result.

Hyon Lim gravatar image Hyon Lim  ( 2012-07-17 00:53:32 -0600 )edit

Just ignore the rosdep steps and try building your packages to find out if it's really a problem.

Lorenz gravatar image Lorenz  ( 2012-07-17 00:54:18 -0600 )edit

Debian install is easier, but it should be possible to install cleanly from source by following the directions.

joq gravatar image joq  ( 2012-07-17 02:48:04 -0600 )edit

Question Tools

Stats

Asked: 2012-07-17 00:06:09 -0600

Seen: 1,490 times

Last updated: Jul 17 '12