ROS Resources: Documentation | Support | Discussion Forum | Index | Service Status | ros @ Robotics Stack Exchange
Ask Your Question
1

message_filters::sync::ApproximateTime does not work properly [closed]

asked 2016-01-11 14:13:33 -0600

Gren8 gravatar image

Good evening, i have an important question. I try to subscribe to two image topics and want them to be synchronized and ready to be processed in one callback. In the callback function i want to convert them via cv_bridge to do some image processing. I've already learned the best way to do this is using the message_filters::sync::ApproximateTime class. The synchronizer works and i can see the images with imshow(). The problem is that the callback function only get called each second so i get a very SLOW image stream. If i move an object i'll see it seconds later moving on the screen.

   void callback(const ImageConstPtr& sub1, const ImageConstPtr& sub2){


        double stamp_1 =sub1->header.stamp.toSec();
        double stamp_2 =sub2->header.stamp.toSec();
        ROS_INFO("\nCALLBACK GETS CALLED\n TIME_STAMP_IMAGE1: %f\n TIME_STAMP_IMAGE2: %f\n", stamp_1, stamp_2);

        Mat image_front, image_back;


        //Converting Image 1
        image1 = *(sub1.get());
        frameptr1=cv_bridge::toCvCopy(bild1, sensor_msgs::image_encodings::BGR8);
        image_front=frameptr1->image;

        //Converting Image 2
        image2 = *(sub2.get());
        frameptr2=cv_bridge::toCvCopy(bild2, sensor_msgs::image_encodings::BGR8);
        image_back=frameptr2->image;

        //Show images
        imshow("window1", image_front);
        imshow("window2", image_back);





    }

    int main(int argc, char** argv) {

        ros::init( argc, argv, "sync_test" );
        ros::NodeHandle nh;
        namedWindow("window1", CV_WINDOW_NORMAL);
        namedWindow("window2", CV_WINDOW_NORMAL);
        cv::startWindowThread();
        message_filters::Subscriber<Image> sub1(nh, "/camera1/image_raw", 1);
        message_filters::Subscriber<Image> sub2(nh, "/camera2/image_raw", 1);


        typedef sync_policies::ApproximateTime<Image, Image> MySyncPolicy;
        // ApproximateTime takes a queue size as its constructor argument, hence MySyncPolicy(10)

        Synchronizer<MySyncPolicy> sync(MySyncPolicy(100), sub1, sub2);
        sync.setAgePenalty(1.0);
        sync.registerCallback(boost::bind(&callback, _1, _2));

        while(ros::ok()){

        ros::spinOnce();
        }

        return 0;

    }

Could anybody see a possibly mistake? I really need help, it's very important for me.

edit retag flag offensive reopen merge delete

Closed for the following reason question is not relevant or outdated by tfoote
close date 2017-04-20 14:02:01.512242

1 Answer

Sort by ยป oldest newest most voted
1

answered 2016-01-11 16:34:11 -0600

Thomas D gravatar image

In main() where you create sub1 and sub2 try increasing the queue_size from 1 to 5 or 10. This will allow the approximate algorithm enough samples to find which messages are closest in time. Alternatively, try reducing the queue_size passed to the sync_policy. You are using 100 and could try dropping that to about 10.

Also, instead of wrapping spinOnce() inside a while loop you can replace the entire while loop with a single call to ros::spin().

edit flag offensive delete link more

Comments

Thanks for the advice, but i already tried it with different values for the queue_size as you said, but it didn't change anything.

Gren8 gravatar image Gren8  ( 2016-01-12 01:35:43 -0600 )edit

Did you ever figure out how to fix this? I have a similar problem.

reben gravatar image reben  ( 2018-01-23 18:20:58 -0600 )edit

Question Tools

1 follower

Stats

Asked: 2016-01-11 14:13:33 -0600

Seen: 2,494 times

Last updated: Jan 11 '16