ROS Message Best Practices

asked 2017-04-10 09:55:02 -0600

Laxnpander
31 ●3 ●4 ●6

Hey there guys,

I am quite new to ROS and have not been involved in bigger projects. However I am confronted with creating one on my own. Working through the tutorials and some literature some of my biggest questions are nowhere to be answered, or at least I don't know how to find them. They are basic (best practice) questions, hopefully you are not too annoyed to answer them :)

I am dealing with a lot of images. A node that is processing an image and adds a slice of information to it (like depth or pose), will I define a new message including the image and the additional informations? Or will I define a message, publishing the additional informations and recombine "image + additional data" in an subsequent node?

First way sounds wrong because of duplicated data, second way sounds annoying by always checking if message id of image is matching the corresponding id of the additional data. Do I miss a basic ros principle?

Thansk for your answer in advance, beste regards

Alex

edit retag flag offensive close merge delete

add a comment

answered 2017-04-10 15:16:20 -0600

NEngelhard
3519 ●24 ●58 ●89

I assume that you send a sensor_msgs/Image. In this case you could publish your additional information with (exactly) this timestamp and use a message_filter with the ExactTime Policy (7.2) in your subscriber. You then get a combined callback for your image and your additional data. The message_filter looks at the timestamps in the header (not the time when the message was received!) so that it's no problem if your processing takes some time. [I'm not quite sure if the ExactTimePolicy has a buffer so you should check if your processing is fast enough to keep up with the images. But at least you won't get wrong matches]

Comments

Hey, great answer thank you! Haven't heard of filters before, this might solve some problems. Is this the Standard way? Time divergence might be a Problem, my images passing through a visual slam. But I will try it, thanks again!